[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Publishers' view/reply to David Prosser
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Publishers' view/reply to David Prosser
- From: "Fytton Rowland" <J.F.Rowland@lboro.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:14:01 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> In the end, it is author behaviour which will drive change > > Sally Morris, Chief Executive Isn't that the whole point? We are all - whether proponents or opponents of OA - agreed that the scholarly journal system is author-driven, and therefore that in the end it is what authors want that will prevail. But it is precisely that feature that makes the present system such an ineffectual market. Authors control the market but do not pay. Libraries pay but have no power (he who pays the piper does *not* call the tune). Thus advocates of market economics should favour an author-pays system! Fytton Rowland, Loughborough University
- Prev by Date: Re: 2nd Nordic Conference on Scholarly Communication .agendas/Watkinson
- Next by Date: Problem licenses
- Previous by thread: Re: Publishers' view/reply to David Prosser
- Next by thread: RE: Publishers' view/reply to David Prosser
- Index(es):