[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Publishers' view/reply to David Prosser
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Publishers' view/reply to David Prosser
- From: "David Goodman" <David.Goodman@liu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:17:14 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
It is absolutely impossible for OA to cost more, in a global sense, if we aggregate every type of expense. The same work is being done to produce the same output. In fact, it must cost a little less if we remove access control from the necessary work. That said, it is true that the costs will be very differently distributed, and dealing with this may be a significant problem. I think all librarians are fully aware of the difficulty of changing things in a university environment. I suggest that publishers and librarians might want to work together, not in opposition, in clarifying the issues, in experimenting, and in bringing about change. I'd like to think, Bernie, that you agree. David Goodman Palmer Library Chool of LIU dgoodman@liu.edu
- Prev by Date: Duke offers free trial access to Duke Math Journal digital archive
- Next by Date: Cornell: Scholarship on Demand
- Previous by thread: Duke offers free trial access to Duke Math Journal digital archive
- Next by thread: Re: Publishers' view/reply to David Prosser
- Index(es):