[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open access pricing
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Open access pricing
- From: Heather Morrison <heatherm@eln.bc.ca>
- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:40:26 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Isn't this the opposite of how competition works? If there is competition in the author-pays version of open access, would it not be the company with the lowest price for the service that would have the advantage? On 20-Feb-04, at 1:55 PM, brs4@lehigh.edu wrote:
(cross-posted)
Regarding the statement below, the following thought of course occurs to many, so it might as well be made explicit for discussion. If Elsevier moves into the open access arena, will this pressure commercial
enterprises such as the BioMed Centrals of the world to raise *their*
prices, just to survive?
Brian Simboli
- Prev by Date: Re: BMC pricing model
- Next by Date: RE: DOI News - December 2003
- Previous by thread: Open access pricing
- Next by thread: Re: Open access pricing
- Index(es):