[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: BioMedCentral Revised Institutional Membership Model
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: BioMedCentral Revised Institutional Membership Model
- From: Phil Davis <pmd8@cornell.edu>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:53:01 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Dear Jan,
Cornell has received its bill for 2004 (our second year of BMC
membership), and we are still charged a fixed membership cost (largest
tier) at $7,065. I checked how many first-author research articles were
published by Cornell authors in 2003 and counted 3, which leads me to
believe that we should have been charged $1,500 (3 x $500) instead. There were other types of materials published (poster presentation, short
communication, editorials, opinions), but even adding up these, I get to 8
publications which totals $4,000. I followed up and found out that all
NERL libraries were also charged flat rates. Will Cornell and all other
libraries that have been overcharged for institutional memberships be
reimbursed?
--Phil Davis
At 06:07 PM 2/10/2004 -0500, Jan Veltrop wrote:
Phil, Apologies if I wasn't clear enough last time. Membership fees after the initial year are calculated on the basis of the number of articles from a given member institution published in that first year, times the base Article Processing Charge. The calculation will take place anytime a membership is up for renewal.
- Prev by Date: RE: BioMedCentral Revised Institutional Membership Model
- Next by Date: BMC subscription fees
- Previous by thread: RE: BioMedCentral Revised Institutional Membership Model
- Next by thread: RE: BioMedCentral Revised Institutional Membership Model
- Index(es):