[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Clarifying (RE: Open access and the ALA)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Clarifying (RE: Open access and the ALA)
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:48:29 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Last night I did a little poking around on the ALA Web site in reaction to > Rick Anderson's question. The answer, I believe, is that the degree of > open access varies by ALA publication. A sampling: Thanks for ferreting out this information, Bernie. Your results confirm my initial suspicion -- that the library profession is not yet in a very good position to criticize other non-profit publishing bodies that are responding slowly and cautiously to the Open Access call. To be fair to the ALA, I should point out that it has, in fact, stopped short of criticizing non-profits that are still charging the public for access to their publications. As others have noted, the ALA _has_ expressed support for the idea of open access, so I assume that it is working towards a business model that will eventually make its publications freely available to all. ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries (775) 784-6500 x273 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Make a fortune with google
- Next by Date: RE: BioMedCentral Revised Institutional Membership Model
- Previous by thread: RE: Clarifying (RE: Open access and the ALA)
- Next by thread: Love affair with Reed begins to cool
- Index(es):