[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Varmus in the Chronicle
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Varmus in the Chronicle
- From: "Fytton Rowland" <J.F.Rowland@lboro.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 08:52:49 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
You may well be right, David. But it isn't the way it looks to the small societies that I was talking to. Their financial data show that personal subs *are* carrying a share of the first-copy costs of the journals. I'm also not sure about public subsidy for societies. One of a society's virtues is its independence - the fact that it is clearly *not* a creature of government. The not-for-profit sector is an important third force in society, alongside the public and private sectors. And of course, for-profit publishers complain that the not-for-profits are already subsidised, by their tax exemptions. Fytton. ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Goodman" <David.Goodman@liu.edu> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>; <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 12:21 AM Subject: RE: Varmus in the Chronicle > The problem Fytton mentions does not become more acute under open access, > it vanishes. In general, member subscriptions are sold at the incremental > price of printing the additional copies; they do not pay the 80% of the > cost that goes into editing and producing the journal (I realize this is a > very rough approximation, and may not apply to all societies.) Any small > contribution made to the costs of preparing the journal will be easily > covered by properly adjusted submission fees. (One approach might be lower > fees for members.) Further, many members will elect to pay a surchange for > print (at least for small journals). > > (It can also be argued that a society which one joins only to get a > journal may be of dubious usefulness in the first place.) > > But the solution that Varmus orginally proposed when he was at NIH is the > simplest and the best: The real contribution that small societies make to > science can best be paid for by a direct subsidy. In an open system like > ours', the cost should be recognized as part of the overall cost of doing > science. > > David Goodman > Palmer Schoool of Library & Information Science, LIU
- Prev by Date: ALPSP Seminar: Managing Risk in a Publishing Environment
- Next by Date: Re: Open access and the ALA
- Previous by thread: RE: Varmus in the Chronicle
- Next by thread: Re: Varmus in the Chronicle (RE: Copyright and OA: New YorkTimes and Chronicle of Higher Ed
- Index(es):