[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Varmus in the Chronicle
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Varmus in the Chronicle
- From: "David Goodman" <David.Goodman@liu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 19:21:11 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The problem Fytton mentions does not become more acute under open access, it vanishes. In general, member subscriptions are sold at the incremental price of printing the additional copies; they do not pay the 80% of the cost that goes into editing and producing the journal (I realize this is a very rough approximation, and may not apply to all societies.) Any small contribution made to the costs of preparing the journal will be easily covered by properly adjusted submission fees. (One approach might be lower fees for members.) Further, many members will elect to pay a surchange for print (at least for small journals). (It can also be argued that a society which one joins only to get a journal may be of dubious usefulness in the first place.) But the solution that Varmus orginally proposed when he was at NIH is the simplest and the best: The real contribution that small societies make to science can best be paid for by a direct subsidy. In an open system like ours', the cost should be recognized as part of the overall cost of doing science. David Goodman Palmer Schoool of Library & Information Science, LIU -----Original Message----- From: Fytton Rowland [mailto:J.F.Rowland@lboro.ac.uk] Sent: Wed 1/28/2004 5:45 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Cc: Subject: Re: Varmus in the Chronicle Another second-order issue has been mentioned to me by some small learned societies. It is a problem for them even with subscription-access electronic publication, but becomes more acute with open access. A fair proportion of their sales have been to private individuals, often requiring those individuals to be members of the society to get the journal. If the individuals' employer institutions subscribe to the electronic version, those individuals can get the electronic version without paying individually - in the print era they had to compete with everyone else for the library copy, so they subscribed themselves. If *everybody* can get the electronic copy free (open access) the problem gets worse (from the society's viewpoint) - no-one needs a personal printed copy, so no-one belongs to the society, which collapses.... Of course that is a caricature extreme, but it is the essence of many small societies' worries. Fytton Rowland, Loughborough University, UK
- Prev by Date: Open access and the ALA
- Next by Date: RE: Varmus in the Chronicle
- Previous by thread: RE: Varmus in the Chronicle
- Next by thread: RE: Varmus in the Chronicle
- Index(es):