[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Looking an open access gift horse in the mouth
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Looking an open access gift horse in the mouth
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:56:02 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> The point is that the two, institutional membership fees and subscritption > fees, are in fact utterly different things. There is no reason why > institutional membership should be paid for by the library budget at all. > Most who favour the OA model make the reasonable assumption that a fair > proportion, at least, of the author payments might be taken from outside > research funding and thus not come from the University's main funds; But when it comes to the impact of the OA model on library budgets, the question isn't what's reasonable -- the question is what's likely. I find it highly unlikely that these fees will, in reality, end up coming from anywhere other than library budgets. Academic units have never responded well to suggestions from the library that they (the academic units) pay for journals themselves. Is there something magical about the OA model that will change their minds? ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries (775) 784-6500 x273 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: Looking an open access gift horse in the mouth
- Next by Date: RE: Looking an open access gift horse in the mouth
- Previous by thread: RE: Looking an open access gift horse in the mouth
- Next by thread: RE: Looking an open access gift horse in the mouth
- Index(es):