[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Looking an open access gift horse in the mouth
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Looking an open access gift horse in the mouth
- From: Jill Emery <Jill.Emery@mail.uh.edu>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:56:43 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
In agreement with Phil Davis' post from last week concerning EMBO and SPARC Europe and as a reaction to the latest post regarding PLoS and the institution of member fees, I pose the following questions which make me feel somewhat like another member of the equine family but nonetheless, here they are... How do most libraries differentiate between institutional membership fees and subscription fees? Do you feel the need to make this distinction at all? Can or should membership fees be paid through subscription agents? As a group, do we feel that these fees are sustainable at the levels at which they are being instituted or will we begin to see increases as the realities of electronic scholarly publishing and maintenance take hold and as the grant funding presently underwriting some of these endeavors dries up? It is a much more agreeable matter for an academic institution to support BioMedCentral or Public Library of Science than some commercial enterprises, however, bearing in mind both the understanding that instead of buying back published research from the commercial sector, libraries are now underwriting the publication of research and that the current pricing structures and models do not seem sustainable at their current levels, are libraries better off with the membership fee model? It has been said that $1500 does not go very far in the creation and support of one to two electronic articles much less a whole electronic sphere of information. Have libraries been able to benefit at a greater extent from the research dollars garnered by their parent institutions if libraries are facilitating the publishing of this research? Basically all of these questions lead to the same bottom line: are most libraries just accepting that open access membership fees are a feasible model and that future price increases can be absorbed? Cordially submitted, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Jill Emery Director, Electronic Resources Program University of Houston 114 University Libraries Houston, TX 77204-2000 713.743.9765 713.743.9778 (fax) JEmery@uh.edu ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Looking an open access gift horse in the mouth
- From: Ann Okerson <aokerson@pantheon.yale.edu>
- Re: Looking an open access gift horse in the mouth
- Prev by Date: Public Library of Science Announces Institutional Membership Program
- Next by Date: Study re. costs of handling p- vs. e-journal formats
- Previous by thread: Public Library of Science Announces Institutional Membership Program
- Next by thread: Re: Looking an open access gift horse in the mouth
- Index(es):