[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: taking out the volume increase as factor
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: taking out the volume increase as factor
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 00:40:29 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> I guess we all want to know, did they or didn't they. If they did why are > prices still up 2 to 3 times inflation?? I think general inflation figures are a red herring. General inflation is an average, and that means that inflation is higher in some industries than in others. If general inflation is, say, 3%, that doesn't necessarily mean that 5% inflation in the widget market is unreasonable. To me, this means that the relation between Elsevier's price increases and general inflation is a poor indicator of reasonableness, and the real question is whether Elsevier's price increases are reasonable. The next real question is whether, reasonable or not, their price increases are supportable in the long run. We can argue about whether 6.5% is reasonable; there's no arguing, however, with the simple fact that if you start with a high price and compound it at an annual rate of 6.5% you will quickly end up with a price that no one can afford to pay. Elsevier is seeing the consequences already at Cornell and elsewhere. ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries (775) 784-6500 x273 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: Taylor &Francis Buys Marcel Dekker
- Next by Date: OCLC and The Library Hotel settle trademark complaint
- Previous by thread: taking out the volume increase as factor
- Next by thread: RE: taking out the volume increase as factor
- Index(es):