[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Artists' Rights and Theft Prevention Act
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Artists' Rights and Theft Prevention Act
- From: "Hamaker, Chuck" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 17:33:45 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
http://news.com.com/2100-1026_3-5106684.html Share 'True Crime,' do the time Last modified: November 12, 2003, 4:20 PM PST By Declan McCullagh Staff Writer, CNET News.com A forthcoming copyright bill backed by key U.S. senators would place file swappers in prison for up to three years if they have a copy of even one prerelease movie in their shared folders. In addition to the prison term, the Artists' Rights and Theft Prevention Act would punish making such movies available on a public "computer network" as a federal felony with a fine of up to $250,000. It would not require that any copyright infringement actually take place. Senators John Cornyn, R-Texas, and Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., plan to introduce the legislation at a press conference in Washington, D.C., on Thursday. Joining them at the event will be actress Bo Derek, Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) President Jack Valenti, and Mitch Bainwol, chairman of the Recording Industry Association of America. .... Chuck Notes: another misnamed bill.. Let's just call it the movie companies want to throw you in jail with a law all their own, as if DMCA etc. isn't draconian enough. Will we have a cascade of " protection" bills with jail terms, one for each industry and its special "needs" the no copying the software in your car law, the thou shalt not have a copy of any software embedded in your refrigerator law, and mandatory prison sentences and whopping fines, or the if you copy this on any machine of any kind, we will bankrupt you bill for every product. This seem to be an industry specific law, Lets hope congress decides they've seen enough stupidity from the movie and music companies. but I doubt it, they do have lots of money for lobbying. Isnt' this more security than top secret lab programs have? Why would we do this to ourselves? Movies are more important than calssified documents? I guess the Movie industry wants to become the second most hated industry in the country-then hey, they could make movies about the evil monsters jailed by the software police, or that new breed of law enforcement, privately employed computer snoopers(call thenm PECSers??), etc., I can see it now. Cigar smoking hoodlum jailed for .oh wait, this is mostly their own industry insiders and of course the FANS and reviewers who tout their products..and academy award movie reviewers.. or someone else with special access? I guess they want to send their own empolyees to jail more often? EVEN IF there is no copyright law broken, send 'em to jail. Dale Carnegie where are you?? Winning friends and influencing people has been overturned with just make it illegal and jail 'em philosophy. Monopoly forever. eh. 90 years...or more, in case you make it and never release in a particular market?? Is it market specific? Even for our best customers, most loyal supporters, et our own employees... I'll bet if they really really tried the RIIA and MPAA together could put a LOT more people in jail than we have there now. Aren't the "estimated" music thieves numbers much larger than the current prison population. You go guys-- I wonder which artists rights are being protected by this misnamed bit of special protection-oh we must soothe the big companies fears law. Hey its all those independent starving artists--Now if Movie companies release a couple of years of turkeys like the music industry has -well, that'll just prove they need more laws- Chuck
- Prev by Date: Swets Blackwell - E-Notes from Swets Blackwell
- Next by Date: Lancet November 8th issue on Open Access
- Previous by thread: Swets Blackwell - E-Notes from Swets Blackwell
- Next by thread: Lancet November 8th issue on Open Access
- Index(es):