[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Will open access spell the end of medical libraries?
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Will open access spell the end of medical libraries?
- From: "David Goodman" <David.Goodman@liu.edu>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 19:29:57 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Another way to view this is that open access, by freeing the library budget from the continuing need to pay for overpriced subscriptions, will permit the funds available for the library to be used for better purposes, such as assisting the users. Since most library material is already "accessible from the physician's office desktop or hospital workstation," although the library has paid for it, I cannot see how the mere fact that the library has not paid for it will change the demand for librarians' services. The experience of most librarians since the widespread use of electronic materials is that the demands from the users have increased. It is no easier to indentify a relevant article now than it used to be, and the easier physical access to larger amounts of material hardly simplifies the problem. Librarians can in general navigate web-based and archive-based systems more effectively than most users--the necessary skills and mind-set are very similar to the traditional ones. Most users will have experienced sufficient frustrations with these system to know the need for professional assistance, just as they need it for other aspects of computer-based operations. It is our opportunity and responsibility to ensure that they recognize that librarians are the ones who can give the needed service. The actual danger is that the money saved from the journal cost will not be used to support either the publication costs in open access schemes, or the library. This is a matter of joint concern to the users and the library, and we should be sure they work together with us on this. David Goodman Palmer School of Library and Information Science, Long Island University -----Original Message----- From: D Anderson [mailto:dh-anderson@corhealth.com] Sent: Tue 11/11/2003 6:23 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Cc: Subject: Will open access spell the end of medical libraries? The cover story in the November 2003 issue of Medicine on the Net is "Open access: Will it spell the end of the medical library?" Science writer Catherine Zandonella explores the possibility that the move to "free" online collections may eliminate the need for a physical library and library staff. Some excerpts, with permission from the publisher: Predictions that technology will do away with the librarian have been around for decades. In the 1957 movie Desk Set, Spencer Tracy plans to replace Katharine Hepburn and her staff of research librarians with a computer. Hepburn, with usual aplomb, shows him the error of his ways. But Hepburn didn't face today's challenging mix of economic factors and a scientific publishing industry that has been described as dysfunctional. The pressures on hospital and medical center library budgets are greater than ever. More than 40 states are reporting budget deficits, which translate to cutbacks at state universities and their medical schools. Endowments for private universities are suffering as the U.S. economy staggers its way out of recession. As if budget cuts weren't enough, librarians are buffeted by yearly price hikes for subscriptions to the scientific journals and information services that their physicians and researchers rely on most. Enter a possible savior: open access publishing. Instead of locking up scientific research in subscription-based journals, open access publishers make the articles freely available on the Internet. Anyone with a computer terminal and a phone line is free to print, copy, distribute, and reuse the article as long as they give proper attribution to the work's authors and publisher. But freedom has its price, and medical librarians could end up being the ones who pay it. With the onset of free access to medical literature, accessible from the physician's office desktop or hospital workstation, cost-conscious hospital managers may be wondering why they should maintain a physical library when a virtual one will do just as well. "Senior executives are looking to cut costs, so open access is attractive," says Logan Ludwig, associate dean of library and telehealth services at Loyola University of Chicago's Strich School of Medicine in Maywood, IL. >From Medicine on the Net http://www.corhealth.com/MOTN/Default.asp Dean H. Anderson COR Health Insight ... not just news http://www.corhealth.com
- Prev by Date: Re: a preservation experience
- Next by Date: RE: a preservation experience
- Previous by thread: Will open access spell the end of medical libraries?
- Next by thread: OACIS for the Middle East prototype released
- Index(es):