[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Not copyrighting facts (RE: copyrighting FACTS???)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Not copyrighting facts (RE: copyrighting FACTS???)
- From: "Charles Oppenheim" <C.Oppenheim@lboro.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 08:01:07 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
All I can say is that I very much hope Mr Johnson's opinion is not typical of liblicense readers! Charles Professor Charles Oppenheim Department of Information Science Loughborough University Loughborough Leics LE11 3TU 01509-223065 (fax) 01509-223053 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Seth Johnson" <seth.johnson@realmeasures.dyndns.org> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>; <C.Oppenheim@lboro.ac.uk> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:32 AM Subject: Re: Not copyrighting facts (RE: copyrighting FACTS???) > Information is intrinsically free. The cost of producing has no > bearing on it. Once it's available, once it's published, it's mine, > it's yours, it's everybody's. Don't forget that. > > To put it another way, with a slight nod towards recognizing the > practical impact of things: The "threat" of information technology is > not the ease of copying; it is not in fact a "threat" at all. What we > now confront is simply the fact that we cannot evade this ineradicable > truth. > > Seth Johnson
- Prev by Date: Google responds to Amazon
- Next by Date: COUNTER Code of Practice adopted by Elsevier-ScienceDirect
- Previous by thread: Re: Not copyrighting facts (RE: copyrighting FACTS???)
- Next by thread: Re: Not copyrighting facts (RE: copyrighting FACTS???)
- Index(es):