[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Not copyrighting facts (RE: copyrighting FACTS???)
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Not copyrighting facts (RE: copyrighting FACTS???)
- From: Seth Johnson <seth.johnson@realmeasures.dyndns.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:22:04 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
"Joseph J. Esposito" wrote: > The bill does not grant copyright status to facts in the database. That > is simply wrong. The bill says you can't copy a database someone else put > together, but nothing stops anyone from independently aggregating the same > facts. Even more bizarre is the repeating of the exact same stratagem in reply. The bill is giving copyright-like protections to facts contained in databases. That's the whole point of it -- create exclusive rights to facts in databases. Seth Johnson
- Prev by Date: RE: BIOSIS/ZR to be sold?
- Next by Date: New Managing Director of Swets Blackwell UK
- Previous by thread: RE: Not copyrighting facts (RE: copyrighting FACTS???)
- Next by thread: Re: Not copyrighting facts (RE: copyrighting FACTS???)
- Index(es):