[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Database Protection Bill (Coble) - Compromise Reached
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Database Protection Bill (Coble) - Compromise Reached
- From: Ann Okerson <aokerson@pantheon.yale.edu>
- Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 10:45:51 -0400 (EDT)
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
>From EDUCAUSE, October 17th, 2003: COMPROMISE REACHED ON DATABASE-PROTECTION BILL A House of Representatives subcommittee has passed a bill that would extend strong intellectual-property protections to databases after opposition from three academic groups was withdrawn. The Database and Collections of Information Misappropriation Act, introduced last week by Howard Coble (R-N.C.), had stirred objections from academic groups, which saw it as a threat to researchers. The original version of the bill included a vague exception for academics, but the version that passed the subcommittee this week has a much stronger exception. According to the revised bill, "no liability shall be imposed under this act" on higher education and research institutions or their employees. With that language, the Association of American Universities, the American Council on Education, and the National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges have ended their opposition to the bill and assumed a neutral position. Other groups, including the National Academies, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and academic-library organizations, continue to oppose the bill. Chronicle of Higher Education, 17 October 2003 (sub. req'd) http://chronicle.com/prm/daily/2003/10/2003101701t.htm ***
- Prev by Date: Re: Reed Elsevier initiated with "underperform"
- Next by Date: Re: Database Protection Bill (Coble) - Compromise Reached
- Previous by thread: Re: Reed Elsevier initiated with "underperform"
- Next by thread: Re: Database Protection Bill (Coble) - Compromise Reached
- Index(es):