[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Open Access Initiative From The Company Of Biologists
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Open Access Initiative From The Company Of Biologists
- From: "David Goodman" <David.Goodman@liu.edu>
- Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 23:17:20 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I believe the Highwire hypothesis, adhered to by this publisher, is that the relatively small group of active researchers will want and demand access as soon as possible; the undergraduates writing term papers will not. Choosing whether 3 or 6 or 12 months is guesswork, of course. I think most authors who think their material important, rather than published merely for reasons of duty or tenure, would want their material available as soon after publication as possible, and freely available too. Thus even such commendable measures as this, and such policies as Highwire's, are at best temporary expedients. The COB quite appropriately announced this as an experiment, and I think that's the way to see it. I hope they will not consider the data they will get next year as an internal secret like so many publishers do, and make the information freely available for the benefit of us all. The time will soon come when such elaborate experiments are no longer necessary, and freely available rapid publication becomes a matter of course for all journals. Personally, I hypothesize that they will find they have been showing excessive caution, considering the quality of their journals--but consider the many publishers who still take no steps whatsoever. As an historical footnote, in the print era, this 3 or 6 month period was seen as a demand peak when the articles were indexed by Chemical abstracts (or Biological abstracts or Index medicus, etc.) At that time, there was considerable discussion among librarians about whether it was better to delay binding for a full year or more, in order not to have the issues at the binders right at the time the abstracts appeared. I well remember continually trying to get binding done quickly enough that the bound volumes could be back before that point, typicaly 4 to 6 months after publication for the major journals, while still not removing them from the shelf the moment it came in, before those who checked each issue could read it. This is, fortunately, a no longer necessary art. Dr. David Goodman Associate Professor Palmer School of Library and Information Science Long Island University dgoodman@liu.edu
- Prev by Date: Ann Okerson received ALPSP Award
- Next by Date: Chronicle article: Libraries' Consortium Conundrum
- Previous by thread: Re: Open Access Initiative From The Company Of Biologists
- Next by thread: RE: Copyright, Trademark and the O**C suit
- Index(es):