[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
U.S. Uses Terror Law to Pursue Crimes From Drugs to Swindling
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: U.S. Uses Terror Law to Pursue Crimes From Drugs to Swindling
- From: "Hamaker, Chuck" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:12:41 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
So it really is about behaviours that aren't related to terrorism All those naif librarians worrying about governmental intrusions-well they just got it wrong. NYTIMES By Eric Lichtblau Sept. 28, 2003 http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/28/politics/28LEGA.html?hp The Bush administration, which calls the USA Patriot Act perhaps its most essential tool in fighting terrorists, has begun using the law with increasing frequency in many criminal investigations that have little or no connection to terrorism. .. For instance, the ability to secure nationwide warrants to obtain e-mail and electronic evidence "has proved invaluable in several sensitive nonterrorism investigations," including the tracking of an unidentified fugitive and an investigation into a computer hacker who stole a company's trade secrets, the report said. Justice Department officials said the cases cited in the report represent only a small sampling of the many hundreds of nonterrorism cases pursued under the law. .. Officials with the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement have seen a sharp spike in investigations as a result of their expanded powers, officials said in interviews. A senior official said investigators in the last two years had seized about $35 million at American borders in undeclared cash, checks and currency being smuggled out of the country. That was a significant increase over the past few years, the official said. While the authorities say they suspect that large amounts of the smuggled cash may have been intended to finance Middle Eastern terrorists, much of it involved drug smuggling, corporate fraud and other crimes not directly related to terrorism. ... Elliot Mincberg, legal director for People for the American Way, a liberal group that has been critical of Mr. Ashcroft, said the Justice Department's public assertions had struck him as misleading and perhaps dishonest. "What the Justice Department has really done," he said, "is to get things put into the law that have been on prosecutors' wish lists for years. They've used terrorism as a guise to expand law enforcement powers in areas that are totally unrelated to terrorism." ... A study in January by the General Accounting Office, the investigative arm of Congress, concluded that while the number of terrorism investigations at the Justice Department soared after the Sept. 11 attacks, 75 percent of the convictions that the department classified as "international terrorism" were wrongly labeled. Many dealt with more common crimes like document forgery. ... Senator Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont, the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, said members of Congress expected some of the new powers granted to law enforcement to be used for nonterrorism investigations. But he said the Justice Department's secrecy and lack of cooperation in putting the legislation into effect made him question whether "the government is taking shortcuts around the criminal laws" by invoking intelligence powers - with differing standards of evidence - to conduct surveillance operations and demand access to records. .. There are many provisions in the Patriot Act that can be used in the general criminal law," Mark Corallo, a department spokesman, said. "And I think any reasonable person would agree that we have an obligation to do everything we can to protect the lives and liberties of Americans from attack, whether it's from terrorists or garden-variety criminals." ___
- Prev by Date: Re: Dewey, the Library Hotel and U. Illinois
- Next by Date: RE: Dewey, the Library Hotel and U. Illinois
- Previous by thread: Re: Dewey, the Library Hotel and U. Illinois
- Next by thread: RE: Copyright, Trademark and the O**C suit
- Index(es):