[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: publisher copyright agreements routinely violate federal regs
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: publisher copyright agreements routinely violate federal regs
- From: "Joseph J. Esposito" <espositoj@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 00:52:24 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
You are misreading these provisions. The INFORMATION is available to the public. Publishers don't care a hoot about information or ideas. Publishers work with the tangible expression of ideas, which is protected by copyright. Ideas are intangible, and no one owns them (outside the world of patents and trade secrets, which is beyond the scope of this thread). This is an apples-and-oranges discussion. Copyright is a weak law. It has nothing to do with ideas and thus cannot in any way interfere with the dissemination of ideas. Joe > Could a publisher who seeks exclusive rights from authors please explain > why they continue to do this? Are you unaware of these provisions? Or am I > misreading these provisions? ***
- Prev by Date: Re: On the Need to Take Both Roads to Open Access
- Next by Date: Re: publisher copyright agreements routinely violate federal regs
- Previous by thread: publisher copyright agreements routinely violate federal regs
- Next by thread: Re: publisher copyright agreements routinely violate federal regs
- Index(es):