[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Requesting User Information and Policy Agreement Prior to Data Exports
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Requesting User Information and Policy Agreement Prior to Data Exports
- From: "Heather Morrison" <hmorrison@ola.bc.ca>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 22:30:12 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
hi Patrick, In a nutshell: yes, there are privacy / freedom issues, as well as economic ones for your company, because many institutions would not be able to purchase under such conditions, due to local privacy laws. The intellectual freedom issue comes up because in this situation, users who are not willing to divulge personal information will lose out on access. Following is a slightly revised repeat of a message I'd sent on this issue this summer; I would also highly recommend looking up Dr. David Goodman's messages on privacy and ICOLC from this summer, as these explain in some detail the kind of technical requirements needed to ensure privacy. repeat of message on privacy: The privacy of the individual user has long been regarded as one of the most basic ethical principles of librarianship. One example of the expression of this principle can be found on the American Library Association's web site at http://www.ala.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Our_Association/Governance/Policy_Manual/Services.htm see: 52.4 Confidentiality of Library Records: [snip] The ethical responsibilities of librarians, as well as statutes in most states and the District of Columbia, protect the privacy of library users. Confidentiality extends to "information sought or received, and materials consulted, borrowed, acquired," and includes database search records, reference interviews, circulation records, interlibrary loan records, and other personally identifiable uses of library materials, facilities, or services. [snip - there's more on the site] Note: in addition to statutes protecting the privacy of library users, a great many jurisdictions have enacted "Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy" type laws. See also the ICOLC Privacy Guidelines for Electronic Resources Vendors a: http://www.library.yale.edu/consortia/2002privacyguidelines.html The significance of the ICOLC Privacy Guidelines, from my point of view,is this: Those who are responsible for purchasing electronic resources in a very great many of the world's libraries considered the question: do individual users have the right to expect privacy in the realm of electronic resources? And the answer was a resounding yes, as expressed in the ICOLC Privacy Guidelines. In particular, the question of whether gathering information about individuals to resell for advertising purposes could be seen as an acceptable business practice was soundly rejected, as being a serious violation of this fundamental principle. The Guidelines themselves are deliberately somewhat broad and philosophical in nature (like the ALA statement above), recognizing that changes in technology could render obsolete any specific procedural proscriptions. This is a personal viewpoint. cheers, Heather Grace Morrison, ELN ****
- Prev by Date: Re: Lawmakers to Weigh Database Protection Bill
- Next by Date: Re: Usage-based pricing, a view
- Previous by thread: RE: Requesting User Information and Policy Agreement Prior to Data Exports
- Next by thread: Re: Requesting User Information and Policy Agreement Prior to Data Exports
- Index(es):