[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: copyright protection paper
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: copyright protection paper
- From: "Sally Morris" <sec-gen@alpsp.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 15:32:23 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
What interests me is what difference, if any, the public domain status of such works has actually made to their accessibility. I wonder whether anyone is studying this? Sally Morris, Secretary-General Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers South House, The Street, Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex BN13 3UU, UK Phone: 01903 871686 Fax: 01903 871457 E-mail: sec-gen@alpsp.org ALPSP Website http://www.alpsp.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lizzie Gadd" <E.A.Gadd@lboro.ac.uk> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 3:08 PM Subject: Re: copyright protection paper > Having just performed an analysis of 80 journal publishers' copyright > transfer agreements and licences as part of the RoMEO project, I was > surprised at the ALPSP survey findings wrt the number of publishers > allowing self-archiving. According to our current list of publisher > self-archiving policies at > http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ls/disresearch/romeo/Romeo%20Publisher%20Policies.htm > just 42.5% of publishers allow self-archiving of any kind. That breaks > down into 25% allowing self-archiving of both pre and post-print, 8.7% > allowing pre-print only, and 8.7% allowing post-print only. We found that > some publishers' general policy statements said they allowed > self-archiving, whilst their actual copyright agreements said that they > did not. I wonder whether this is what we are seeing in the ALPSP > findings? > > With regard to US Govt-owned works, we found that 57.5% of agreements > recognised that manuscripts may belong in this category by virtue of a > specific clause. This illustrates that many publishers are willing/able > to live with a parallel publication system where a work is both in the > public domain and published in a peer-reviewed vehicle. The full-text of > an article (soon to appear in Learned Publishing) based on our analysis is > available on the Project RoMEO web pages at: > http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ls/disresearch/romeo/RoMEO%20Studies%204.pdf > > Best > Elizabeth Gadd > Pilkington Library, Loughborough University, > e.a.gadd@lboro.ac.uk
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: copyright protection paper
- From: Ann Okerson <ann.okerson@yale.edu>
- Re: copyright protection paper
- Prev by Date: Re: copyright protection paper
- Next by Date: Re: copyright protection paper
- Previous by thread: Re: copyright protection paper
- Next by thread: Re: copyright protection paper
- Index(es):