[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Open Access pricing and the perceived ability of research
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, "'gdresser@allenpress.com'" <gdresser@allenpress.com>, "David Goodman (E-mail)" <DgoodmanNY@aol.com>
- Subject: RE: Open Access pricing and the perceived ability of research
- From: "Hamaker, Chuck" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:20:38 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Given the The Sonny Bono Mickey Mouse protection act perhaps the print of the last 25 years won't be distintegrating when it enters the public domain sometime in 2075-2100+, unlike the material published since 1926 which will be dust on the shelves before its in public domain. Where's an orphan IP law when you need it! Chuck Hamaker -----Original Message----- From: Guy Dresser [mailto:gdresser@allenpress.com] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 5:55 PM To: David Goodman; liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: Open Access pricing and the perceived ability of research It seems to me ironic that after librarians campaigned for years to get printers to use acid-free paper, and for the paper mills to make it, now that almost all of the mills making journal and book paper have converted to the alkaline pulping process librarians are cancelling their print subscriptions in favor of fragile electronic products. Not that I think print has a long future, but I wonder if we were wasting our time fighting that battle. Guy Dresser
- Prev by Date: Re: Bibliography on publishing economics
- Next by Date: RE: OUP online missing content
- Previous by thread: RE: Open Access pricing and the perceived ability of research
- Next by thread: RE: Open Access pricing and the perceived ability of research
- Index(es):