[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Privacy and ICOLC
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Privacy and ICOLC
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 02:08:31 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Most certainly I agree with everything Heather says, especially On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Heather Morrison wrote: > The [IOCLC] Guidelines > themselves are deliberately somewhat broad and philosophical in nature > (like the ALA statement above), recognizing that changes in technology > could render obsolete any specific procedural proscriptions. Surely it is now appropriate to move to practical implementations appropriate to the present technology in both information distribution and the potential for violation of basic rights. Since I do not suggest that we will be able or willing to violate local law, this means we must organize our operations so as to protect ourselves and our patrons. I am not talking only to librarians. If publishers propose to continue to operate internationally, and still disseminate truthful and durable information, they too must redesign their operations. Speaking personally, Dr. David Goodman Palmer School of Library and Information Science, LIU and Princeton University. dgoodman@princeton.edu
- Prev by Date: Price discrimination for the non-economist
- Next by Date: NYTimes.com Article: In DSpace, Ideas Are Forever
- Previous by thread: Privacy and ICOLC
- Next by thread: Re. Candover and Cinven-Springer purchase
- Index(es):