[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Intertrust vs. Microsoft (DRM patent disputes)
- To: "Liblicense-L (E-mail)" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Intertrust vs. Microsoft (DRM patent disputes)
- From: "Hamaker, Chuck" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 18:50:58 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
http://www.latimes.com/technology/la-fi-patent16jul16,1,1846497.story?col=l= 3Dla-headlines-technology (must register for access I believe) July 16, 2003 CALIFORNIA Ruling Boosts InterTrust Claims By Jon Healey, Times Staff Writer Judge accepts the firm's definitions in a patent suit against Microsoft. Decision could make it easier to prove the case ... The judge has yet to decide whether InterTrust's 11 patents were violated by Microsoft's products, including its recent operating systems, productivity programs, digital media player and Xbox game console. But two independent patent attorneys said her ruling could make it easier for InterTrust to prove its case. (note apparently Microsoft is using/supportingContentGuard's XrML?) ... InterTrust was bought for $453 million in November by Fidelio Acquisition Co., a venture launched by Sony Corp., Royal Philips Electronics and Stephens Acquisition See also MSFT DRM infringes on Sony/Philips DRM at Boing Boing Blog posted by Cory Doctorow http://boingboing.net/2003_07_01_archive.html#200443678 Also see DMCA Activitist listserv archive: From: Seth Johnson[DMCA-Activists] Intertrust Ahead in Digital Racket ManagementPatent Fig http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/dmca-activists/2003-07/msg00018.html above material: excerpted from RIGHTS-L@LISTSERV.UTK.EDU posted by Hodge, Chris [chodge5@UTK.EDU] July 17, 2003
- Prev by Date: RE: Monopolies in publishing
- Next by Date: re: Monopolies in publishing: defining quality
- Previous by thread: Open Access Planning Guides
- Next by thread: re: Monopolies in publishing: defining quality
- Index(es):