[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Monopolies in publishing
- To: "'David Goodman '" <dgoodman@princeton.edu>, "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu '" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Monopolies in publishing
- From: Jan Velterop <jan@biomedcentral.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 17:40:32 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
David, Awareness and quality certainly are important variables in the equation. Open access articles are more 'findable', simply because not only are they in open repositories, they are also indexed, on a full-text basis, in search engines like Google. Almost half of the link-in's into the BMC journals come via Google. As for quality, the more quality authors publish their quality papers in open access journals, the more prestige these journals gain. Prestige isn't only conveyed by journal to author, but also vice versa. We are working flat out to make open access succeed, and your support is highly appreciated indeed. Best, Jan -----Original Message----- From: David Goodman To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Sent: 7/10/03 10:29 PM Subject: RE: Monopolies in publishing Jan, you might be over-simplifying a little when you say that the best "guarantee [of] optimal dissemination [is] via open access." Certainly the physical availability is one part of effective dissemination. But so is knowledge of the existence of the article, and knowledge that the article is likely to be worth reading. Most people do look through at least one or two key journals, and an article on their subject in such a journal will come to their effective notice. (Certainly there are other ways, but in practice that's the current awareness method most of us do use. And that it's worth reading is partly known through the certification of the journal's name. (Again, there are other methods. I am told that physicists sometimes simply look for familiar author names in the appropriate section of ArXiv, for example.) This doesn't only apply to journals: the best way to get me to read something is to post it on this list--not just any list. I could search Google every day or so for familiar names, too (but I don't--partly because I want to see the newcomers.) So besides open access, the other parts are widespread practical awareness, and quality. When projects such as yours achieve them, they will have succeeeded. You know that I hope it will be very soon. Dr. David Goodman Princeton University Library and Palmer School of Library & Information Science, Long Island University dgoodman@princeton.edu
- Prev by Date: Turpion Journals - 2004 subscription rates
- Next by Date: RE: Monopolies in publishing
- Previous by thread: RE: Monopolies in publishing
- Next by thread: RE: Monopolies in publishing
- Index(es):