[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Monopolies in publishing
- To: "'Terry Hulbert '" <terry.hulbert@iop.org>, Jan Velterop <jan@biomedcentral.com>, "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu '" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Monopolies in publishing
- From: Jan Velterop <jan@biomedcentral.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 19:16:10 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Terry, You're absolutely right. In physics, articles do seem to exist in two places. But they're not exactly the same. In Archiv, they are preprints without a journal 'label sown into them', and in the journals they obviously have this 'label'. The biggest puzzle to me is, too, why do large numbers of librarians fork out often substantial sums, basically just for the labels. Maybe the labels are worth it. Perhaps one of the librarians on this list might want to comment. Jan -----Original Message----- From: Terry Hulbert To: jan@biomedcentral.com; liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Sent: 7/11/03 6:44 AM Subject: RE: Monopolies in publishing I've been lurking too long, and I know I'm going to hate myself for doing this :-) But here's an interesting thing. What you say is logically and theoretically correct, but we don't live in a world of logic and theory. In the world of physics what you're suggesting doesn't quite stack up - researchers have access to articles on the pre-print servers, they're heavily used. So, in fact, an article (or at least something approaching an equivalent) can and often does 'exist' in two places. And a large number of institutions still subscribe to physics journals. Why is that? Terry Hulbert Institute of Physics Publishing
- Prev by Date: RE: Monopolies in publishing: questions
- Next by Date: RE: Monopolies in publishing
- Previous by thread: RE: Monopolies in publishing
- Next by thread: RE: Monopolies in publishing
- Index(es):