[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Cataloguing open access
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Cataloguing open access
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 17:36:22 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Lotte Jorgensen, I am impressed by the extent of the work you and your colleagues have been doing. I agree that yours is a viable option, and may be the best choice especially for a scientific or technical collection. There is certainly room to experiment, as no one at all thinks the existing systems are really satisfactory. In particular, I think I would agree with you that we need to be talking about an integrated article/journal system, not just a system at the journal level. My personal opinion is to go with the catalog supplemented by SFX, but my reason is mainly that this is the approach I know the best as that's the system I work with. Perhaps the details of this belong elsewhere, but I would think that discussions of the general concepts remain appropriate here, because the usability of the access system is certainly crucial. On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, [iso-8859-1] J�rgensen Lotte wrote: > In reply to David Goodman I would like to clarify some points regarding > our system ELIN@ at Lund University Our aim is an integrated > journal/article system, because we definitely agree that this is > necessary. The description I gave of ELIN@ was rather short and may have > given the wrong impression. It is much more than a journal list. It is > integrated with our local OPAC with links from one to the other. We are > planning to add all our paper titles into ELIN@ with holdings and links to > the OPAC record. We are also adding metadata of non-subscribed titles with > order options and we are working on integration with the subject based > bibliographic databases. > > Our users are creative and impatient and if we don't serve them for sure > they will find other ways. With all the interlinking options available > online it can be argued that one single catalog is if not pointless then > at least not necessary. You can have different collections in different > databases and as long as you can cross search them I don't think the users > care what input format we are using. :-) > > Regards > > Lotte Jorgensen > E-mail: lotte.jorgensen@lub.lu.se
- Prev by Date: ELIN@ at Lund University
- Next by Date: Science Journals from Central Europe
- Previous by thread: RE: Cataloguing open access
- Next by thread: U of California to launch open-access journals
- Index(es):