[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Librarians push back against complicated e-packages
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Librarians push back against complicated e-packages
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@princeton.edu>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:30:40 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Rick, have you ever succeeded in actually getting such a refund? Dr. David Goodman Princeton University Library and Palmer School of Library & Information Science, Long Island University dgoodman@princeton.edu ----- Original Message ----- From: Rick Anderson <rickand@unr.edu> Date: Sunday, June 22, 2003 9:45 pm Subject: RE: Librarians push back against complicated e-packages > > Perhaps you need a clause in your contract allowing for a prorated refund > > in the event access is not possible due to circumstances within the > > publisher's or vendor's control? If you lose access a quarter of the > > time, why not ask for a quarter of your money back? > > I push for such language in our licenses on a regular basis, almost always > successfully. As long as I emphasize that I'm not going to ask for a > _full_ refund, but only a refund for the amount of product that I paid for > up front but didn't end up getting, they usually agree. > > ------------- > Rick Anderson > rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: The Economist and e-Archiving
- Next by Date: Cataloging Open Access Journals
- Previous by thread: Re: Librarians push back against complicated e-packages
- Next by thread: RE: Librarians push back against complicated e-packages
- Index(es):