[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: The Economist and e-Archiving
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: The Economist and e-Archiving
- From: "Karl A. Kocher" <kakocher@ucdavis.edu>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 19:51:23 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Rick Anderson wrote: [Chuck Hammaker's comment:] >Wiping out the record of my saying unspeaklable things about someone or >something destroys the full history of that action. > ... > >The Internet is a means of distribution. You can't stop distributing >something and continue distributing it at the same time. That is the fundamental problem in a nutshell. If one purchases content in a retainable format, one possesses the copy, no matter what a court or a tyrant decrees. If one only acquires a right to view, one possesses nothing tangible; there is no historical record when the electricity goes off or the cable is cut. This all points to the fundamental importance of the right of the purchaser to retain an archival copy - subject of course to the traditional restraints of copyright - if there is to be a historical record.
- Prev by Date: supreme court OK's congressionally mandated censorship
- Next by Date: Re: FW: The Economist and e-Archiving
- Previous by thread: RE: The Economist and e-Archiving
- Next by thread: Re: FW: The Economist and e-Archiving
- Index(es):