[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: The Economist and e-Archiving
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <John.E.Cox@btinternet.com>
- Subject: RE: The Economist and e-Archiving
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 20:07:16 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Who decides what is unlawful to publish? Legislative bodies and the courts. > To archive? Legislative bodies and the courts. > About your right to speak? Legislative bodies and the courts. > To archive? Legislative bodies and the courts. Let's be clear about something here: libel and slander are not civil rights. The law does indeed limit what we can say and publish, and I don't believe any thoughtful person would have it otherwise. The question is whether a slander, once illegally published, thereby acquires the special status of being part of the "public record" and therefore must remain available to the public. Personally, I don't think that needs to be the case, but I can understand arguments to the contrary. ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition The University Libraries "Perfect clarity is the University of Nevada, Reno ultimate style. A sentence 1664 No. Virginia St. should be as lean as an Reno, NV 89557 equation." PH (775) 784-6500 x273 -- David Quammen FX (775) 784-1328 (paraphrasing Russell) rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: Librarians push back against complicated e-packages
- Next by Date: RE: The Economist and e-Archiving
- Previous by thread: Re: The Economist and e-Archiving
- Next by thread: RE: The Economist and e-Archiving
- Index(es):