[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Trust a high value in electronic content
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Trust a high value in electronic content
- From: Peter Suber <peters@earlham.edu>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 18:47:46 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
At 07:41 AM 6/16/2003 -0400, you wrote:
___Here's an insightful piece from Outsell, Inc., regarding our need for trust in electronic content, these days when increasingly huge amounts of information are available. It's particularly apposite at a time when we speak of for-free access to materials that authors of articles put on their or others' web sites. Do we really believe that peer reviewed journals can be replaced in this way? Do we really imagine a huge mass of unfiltered content can substitute for content that is filtered and categorized? How? Outsell, Inc., has given us permission to reproduce these snippets on liblicense-l. Sincerely The Moderators
This is a damaging myth. The open-access movement does not support using personal web sites to bypass peer review.
Excerpt from the Budapest Open Access Initiative FAQ:
BOAI seeks open access for peer-reviewed literature. The only exception is for preprints, which are put online prior to peer review but which are intended for peer-reviewed journals at a later stage in their evolution. Peer review is medium-independent, as necessary for online journals as for print journals, and no more difficult. Self-publishing to the internet, which bypasses peer review, is not the kind of open access that BOAI seeks or endorses.http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm
Excerpt from Peter Suber, "Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature," _Journal of Biology_, 1, 1 (June 2002) pp. 3f:
Researchers could put their own articles on their home pages and bypass peer review, but that is not the kind of open access advocated by the Public Library of Science, the Budapest Open Access Initiative, or BioMed Central (the publishers of Journal of Biology). All the major open-access initiatives agree that peer review is essential to scientific journals, whether these journals are online or in print, free of charge or 'priced'. Open access removes the barrier of price, not the filter of quality control.
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/writing/jbiol.htm ---------- Peter Suber, Professor of Philosophy Earlham College, Richmond, Indiana, 47374 Email peter.suber@earlham.edu Web http://www.earlham.edu/~peters Editor, Free Online Scholarship Newsletter http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/ Editor, FOS News blog http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/fosblog.html
- Prev by Date: Re: Libraries Urge Justice Department to Block Cinven and Candover
- Next by Date: RE: Librarians push back against complicated e-packages
- Previous by thread: Trust a high value in electronic content
- Next by thread: Re: Trust a high value in electronic content
- Index(es):