[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Librarians push back against complicated e-packages
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Librarians push back against complicated e-packages
- From: Ann Okerson <ann.okerson@yale.edu>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:26:32 -0400 (EDT)
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
This news clip, from Outsell's e-briefs, reports on a session at the recent SLA meeting. Of possible interest to readers. The Moderators ========================================== Outsell's e-briefs June 13, 2003 A Weekly Analysis of Events and Issues Affecting the Information Content Industry ========================================== [SNIP SNIP SNIP] E-Subs: Back to the Future At the SLA conference this week, a standing-room-only session pitted irate content buyers, ready for a fight, against a panel of publishers and aggregators. Highest on buyers' exasperation list is the extinction of the print-journal purchasing model - from simpler times when subscription agents consolidated subscriptions, ordering and invoicing, and provided standard annual price listings. "Why can't you publish your [e-journal] subscription prices and remove the car-dealership bartering from the process?" one frustrated buyer asked, to enthusiastic applause. Buyers are fed up with having to negotiate terms, publisher by publisher, subscription by subscription, and devoting increased staff time to a low-value activity. There is some progress; Elsevier and EBSCO described a partnership that's making e-journal subscriptions work more like the old subscription agent system after prices are set, but the constant requirement for price and terms negotiation has yet to be adequately addressed. Outsell's newly published Briefing on corporate information professionals (see below) identifies a slowdown in the pace of libraries' move to digital environments. The complexity of e-journal purchasing models and methods is certainly one reason for that slowdown. Buyers are also increasingly interested in pay-per-view, where the document is the unit of purchase, not the journal, and libraries continue to replace some subscriptions with pay per view. The bottom line is that publishers, aggregators, and document delivery providers have yet to find the models that fit the needs of these frustrated buyers. That's what happens when vendors are more concerned with preserving revenue than with trying to find the new model that fits the new technology. [SNIP] ============================================================ We want to hear your feedback, and we want to publish your comments on the events we cover in e-briefs (anonymously if you prefer). Send comments, news, insights to: David Curle Editor, e-briefs Outsell, Inc. mail to:dcurle@outsellinc.com ============================================================ Redistribution: Outsell's e-briefs is a subscription service. Individual subscribers may not redistribute to other persons without permission. Company subscribers have the right to distribute content freely within their companies/institutions, but not to persons outside their companies/institutions without permission. Subscriptions: Visit our Web site at http://www.outsellinc.com to order subscriptions to e-briefs. Rates are as follows: $395 for an individual subscription. Single reader with no redistribution rights. $1995 for a company subscription. Includes the right to redistribute to any number of readers within your company/institution. e-briefs is delivered on Fridays, 48 issues per year. ============================================================ Outsell is the only research and advisory firm that focuses exclusively on the Information Content Industry. As an independent adviser, we emphasize close relationships with our clients and deliver high-quality, fact-based research, analysis, and advice about every aspect of content strategy, deployment, and use to a wide range of vendors, buyers, and users of information. Founded in 1994, Outsell helps world-class content vendors, Global 2000 companies, government agencies, and leading educational institutions increase their understanding of users and end-markets, assess content quality and effectiveness, benchmark operations, hire and retain executives, and develop more successful internal and commercial content products and services. ============================================================ Outsell, Inc.'s information, analysis, opinion, and reports (the "Information") are based on qualitative and/or quantitative research methods and its staff's extensive professional expertise in the industry. Outsell, Inc. has used its best efforts and judgment in the compilation and presentation of the Information and believes the Information is accurate as of the date furnished, but the industry and the Information are subject to rapid change. Except as aforesaid, Outsell, Inc. makes no other representations or warranties, express or implied, concerning or relating to the Information. Copyright 2002 Outsell, Inc. ============================================================
- Prev by Date: ALA/CLA Toronto Program from ALCTS/AAP
- Next by Date: Trust a high value in electronic content
- Previous by thread: ALA/CLA Toronto Program from ALCTS/AAP
- Next by thread: RE: Librarians push back against complicated e-packages
- Index(es):