[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tiered pricing models - request for clarification
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Tiered pricing models - request for clarification
- From: "Heather Morrison" <hmorrison@ola.bc.ca>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:10:02 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I'm not familiar with APS, but here are my thoughts on tiered pricing models: The tiered pricing model basically groups libraries by size and/or type for pricing purposes. BC ELN, for example, encourages vendors to provide pricing for 5 tiers of post-secondary libraries: 2-year college, university college, small university, medium university, large university. Tiers can apply to other library types as well, for example, public libraries can be divided into small, medium, large, or megacity. Or, corporate libraries can be classified by the number of employees, e.g. 1-50 employees, 50-100, etc. One of the advantages of tiered pricing models is that a single set of prices can be developed to apply to different library types. There are a variety of classifications in use, for examples different vendors will have fewer tiers, others more, the cut-offs for the different categories often vary, and definitions of user counts vary (e.g. fte vs. head count). The major advantage of the tiered pricing model is its simplicity, for both communications and billing purposes. For consortia, there can be advantages in reducing the amount of time spent renegotiating if the number of libraries changes in the process of setting up or renewing a consortial offer. The major disadvantage of tiered pricing is that there can be huge jumps in price when a library increases in size just a little, but just enough to be bumped up to the next tier. When working with tiered pricing and large group purchases, it's important to remember to look at the larger group as a group on its own, rather than just a collection of smaller libraries. That is, it might make more sense to create a new tier price, even if it's a one-off, than to start by multiplying the number of libraries per tier. hope this helps! Heather Grace Morrison, Project Coordinator, BC ELN liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu writes: >Comments from Cremer, Monika (cremer.sub.uni-goettingen.de) >Submitted on: Tue Apr 29 09:33:10 2003 > >Dear collegues, > >can you explain the "tier pricing model" which is used by APS for >instance? How functions the clasification in different tiers? > >Thank you! >Sincerely > >Monika Cremer
- Prev by Date: Alumni and Friends of the Library Donors
- Previous by thread: Tiered pricing models - request for clarification
- Next by thread: Opening: Electronic Resources Librarian
- Index(es):