[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
URGENT! Egregious OH bill threatens public access]
- To: "Liblicense-L (E-mail)" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: URGENT! Egregious OH bill threatens public access]
- From: "Hamaker, Chuck" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:32:27 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Fwd: Fwd: URGENT! Egregious OH bill threatens public access Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 09:47:15 -0700 (PDT) From: martin@skmassociates.net Reply-To: SCHOLCOMM@ala.org To: "ACRL Scholarly Communication T.F." <SCHOLCOMM@ala.org> Please excuse any duplication. Librarians in Ohio will want to contact their state legislators immediately regarding this bill. Others will need to look out for the possible introduction of similar legislation in their own states. Thanks for taking action in this effort. Sue Martin Visiting Program Officer for Scholarly Communication Association of College and Research Libraries ------- Start of forwarded message ------- >>> Mary Alice Baish <baish@law.georgetown.edu> 04/21/03 06:57PM >>> Friends, I just learned from law librarians in Ohio about an immediate legislative crisis there. H.B. 145, the Electronic Government Services Act, would prevent state agencies from providing access to information. It has been added to the budget bill which has already passed the House. This is model legislation promoted by a group called ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council, www.alec.org) that was introduced last year in a handful of states, including Ohio, and was successfully stopped. H.B. 145 is now an add on to the budget bill, H.B. 95. It prohibits a state government agency from providing information if there are two or more competing private enterprises providing those services. That would mean that a government agency would not be allowed to post its regulations or decision on its Web site if, for example, Lexis, WestLaw, or other companies offer that information for sale. This year's version of the bill exempts the Ohio Supreme Court and Legislature where much of the opposition last year focused. However, state agencies would be impacted by the legislation and agency information that is now available at no cost on agency Web sites will likely disappear if HB 145 is enacted. Here's a link to the bill: http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=125_HB_145 Section 1306.20 Paragraph (I) defines "state agency" as "every organized body, office, or agency established by the laws of the state for the exercise of any function of state government, but does not include the general assembly, any legislative agency, the supreme court, the other courts of record in this state, or any judicial agency." Section 1306.25 (E)(1) further includes under "state agency" "similar agency of a county, township, municipal corporation, or other political subdivision,..." It then substantially limits their ability to publish electronically. While H.B. 145 is not as onerous as the previously withdrawn H.B. 482 of last year, it is a huge threat to public access. This bill threatens the right of residents in Ohio from accessing state government information, created with their tax dollars, at no cost through the Internet. It is an abhorrent model that must be stopped short. Please get involved, especially if you have members in Ohio who can respond immediately to this serious threat. Thanks, Mary Alice Baish American Association of Law Libraries Associate Washington Affairs Representative
- Prev by Date: New Librarian Rate for the SSP Annual Meeting, Baltimore, May 28-30, 2003
- Next by Date: Re: Eric Hellman's patent application
- Previous by thread: New Librarian Rate for the SSP Annual Meeting, Baltimore, May 28-30, 2003
- Next by thread: Perennial renewal problems with ASCE journals
- Index(es):