[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Publicly funded research
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, lis-forum@ncsi.iisc.ernet.in, naglaxman@yahoo.com
- Subject: Publicly funded research
- From: Subbiah Arunachalam <arun@mssrf.res.in>
- Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 15:52:50 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Recently I received this on the mail: While I don't believe the US government can dictate WHERE something is published, I do believe it has every right and even an obligation (to the public health if nothing else) to dictate the conditions of how the published research that comes out of grants it funds. Specifically, it could require that all of it be made available to the public free, as Medline is now. I believe it is such a big player (the elephant in the living room?) that it could make such a requirement stick. Sure, JAMA can get it "first" (or Nature or Science), but then it also becomes available elsewhere. If publishers don't like it, then so much the better for open access journals. Harvey Brenneise Michigan Public Health Institute hbrenne@mphi.org --- I agree. Results of all publicly funded research - whether funded by US Govt or Pakistani Govt or Cuban Govt - should be made available free. Surely, the governments have a right to pass suitable legislation. Arun
- Prev by Date: Oxford Journals Online Pricing Options 2004
- Next by Date: RE: Tenure and journals (RE: Elsevier profit)
- Previous by thread: Oxford Journals Online Pricing Options 2004
- Next by thread: Re: Publicly funded research
- Index(es):