[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AAHSL: More on Elsevier
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: AAHSL: More on Elsevier
- From: Tom Williams <twilliam@bbl.usouthal.edu>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 18:05:01 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
In figuring out the profit margin for Elsevier and Science Direct, we have to differentiate between the two. In the article below from a year ago, it is stated that SD had a whopping gross increase of 44% with a net profit of 34%. There were several areas of Reed-Elsevier that actually lost money. When Reed-Elsevier factors in its losing departments and those doing so-so to good and then includes the Science Direct profits, the overall profit margin may then be in the 10-15% range. The overall Reed-Elsevier profit is not what we are most concerned with but rather the SD profit. That's the one that comes off of our collective backs. No matter how they spin the numbers, our budgets are being routinely sacked. The high prices we pay are used to bolster weaker divisions of the company See the article below. -- Thomas L. Williams, AHIP Director, Biomedical Libraries University of South Alabama College of Medicine Mobile, Al 36688-0002 tel. (251)460-6885 fax. (251)460-7638 twilliam@bbl.usouthal.edu ---------- Forwarded message ---------- ****************MARKETPLACE NEWS***************** SCIENCE DIRECT, HARCOURT PACING REED ELSEVIER There was fierce opposition in the library community last year to Reed Elsevier's acquisition of Harcourt General, saying the move would further concentrate publishing power under one giant corporate umbrella, diminishing the bargaining power of customers. While the jury is still out on how the deal is affecting library budgets, early returns for Reed Elsevier shareholders are clearly positive. Nearly a year after completion of the deal, analysts say Reed Elsevier shareholders are indeed reaping the financial benefits of the deal. Although not yet fully integrated, the Anglo-Dutch publisher reports that Harcourt, for which Reed Elsevier paid more than $4 billion, saw revenues jump a healthy 12 percent to $545.7 million, accounting for 12 percent of Reed Elsevier's 2001 revenue. Meanwhile ScienceDirect, Reed Elsevier's online journal publishing operation also reported whopping growth in 2001. The company reported that ScienceDirect page views doubled in 2001 to 220 million, with revenues in Reed Elsevier's Science and Medical division up by a staggering 44 percent, and operating profits up a hefty 34 percent. -------------------------------------
- Prev by Date: Re: Confidentiality language and the netLibrary license
- Next by Date: Re: Confidentiality language and the netLibrary license
- Previous by thread: Round one looking good! ERIC Reauthorization
- Next by thread: Re: AAHSL: More on Elsevier
- Index(es):