[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Elsevier profit
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Elsevier profit
- From: Harvey Brenneise <HBrenne@MPHI.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 17:51:08 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
There has been some discussion of this, I believe. I think a good argument can be made that taxpayers should not be asked twice to pay for the same thing. On the other hand, I have very low expectations from an administration that values monopolies, profiteering and tax breaks for the rich in the name of "the marketplace" above the needs of the people. Seems like someone once called this "voodoo economics." Harvey Brenneise hbrenne@mphi.org -----Original Message----- From: Brian Simboli [mailto:brs4@lehigh.edu] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 11:02 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Elsevier profit The following is an intriguing idea. Has it ever been entertained or discussed in any way? Brian Simboli "Frankly, if the US Government simply dictated that all research resulting from federal grants had to be freely available to the public who paid for it would put a big hole in publisher monopolies." --
- Prev by Date: Re: Confidentiality language and the netLibrary license
- Next by Date: Re: Elsevier profit
- Previous by thread: Re: Elsevier profit
- Next by thread: Re: Elsevier profit
- Index(es):