[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Problems with Blackwell Publishing Standard License Agreement
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Problems with Blackwell Publishing Standard License Agreement
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 16:33:02 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> This license does not require a signature, but, we are supposed to make > the terms available to our users. Since it does not require a signature > are the rest of you ignoring the license assuming that it would not stand > in a court of law? Unless you sign it, it's not a contract -- at least, not unless you're in a UCITA state, in which case I believe there's a bit more murkiness to the legal status of "contracts of adhesion." I make it a point not to negotiate license agreements that don't require a signature. It's too much work, takes too much time and grants too much implied legitimacy to what is not, in fact, a legally binding document. ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition The University Libraries University of Nevada, Reno "It takes a pretty good 1664 No. Virginia St. meeting to be better Reno, NV 89557 than no meeting at all." PH (775) 784-6500 x273 -- Boyd K. Packer FX (775) 784-1328 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: SCHOLCOMM - Begins Feb. 24
- Next by Date: JSTOR Participants' Meeting and Open Proxy Information Session
- Prev by thread: Problems with Blackwell Publishing Standard License Agreement
- Next by thread: FW: Problems with Blackwell Publishing Standard License Agreement
- Index(es):