[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RoweCom in LJ Academic News Wire
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RoweCom in LJ Academic News Wire
- From: Ann Okerson <aokerson@pantheon.yale.edu>
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 20:39:58 -0500 (EST)
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 08:28:35 -0800 From: chlj@espcomp.com To: AOKERSON@pantheon.yale.edu Subject: Library Journal Academic News Wire: February 04, 2003 Library Journal Academic Newswire (TM) February 4, 2003 [SNIP] FRAUD? ROWECOM CREDITORS SUE DIVINE CLAIMING FRAUDULENT INDUCEMENT A day after the subscription agent RoweCom filed for bankruptcy protection last week (see LJ Academic Newswire 1/28/03) as part of the process of its sale to EBSCO, its creditors did what many expected--they filed suit against parent company, divine, inc. The case now furthers charges that officials at struggling divine may have committed fraud by inducing RoweCom to collect funds from libraries for services it knew it could not provide. The suit alleges that divine officials siphoned a substantial $73.7 million from the subsidiary, which collected the funds from thousands of libraries, even though divine allegedly had determined last spring that it could no longer support RoweCom. In response, divine officials said that the allegations are "without merit," adding that the company hoped to "achieve a global solution... in the next several days." The suit was filed on behalf of RoweCom "debtors," not the ad hoc creditors committee that has helped facilitate the sale to EBSCO. Particularly serious is the suit's allegation that divine encouraged RoweCom to offer programs designed to save libraries money--programs that in reality may have been little more than a scheme to raise cash. Under the heading "divine Loots RoweCom," the suit claims that divine told RoweCom to offer discounts to customers who paid early and also offer a "cash first" program in which customers had to pay for orders before they were actually placed with publishers. Of the nearly $74 million requested in the suit, $65 million had been collected for subscriptions. That $65 million now stands as an estimate of the unpaid subscriptions, although some observers had speculated the bill could climb higher, over $100 million. According to the bankruptcy filing, the largest creditors are the National Institutes of Health, with $2.4 million at stake, Virginia Tech, with $1.6 million, and 3M Co., with $1.3 million. While divine officials expressed confidence they could win any potential litigation, the company clearly cannot afford a verdict against it. According to THE DAILY DEAL, a staggering 16 acquisitions since March 2001 and a slumping business have left divine with only $62.3 million in cash, less even than the sum named in the suit. Its stock is trading at roughly 86 cents per share on the strength of a 1-for-25 reverse split last May. [SNIP] Copyright (c) 2002 Library Journal. All rights reserved. Redistribution allowed only via E-mail delivery or print- out/photocopy distribution within 60 days of original transmission and only to individuals affiliated with the institution which received the original E-mail from Library Journal. "Library Journal" is a registered trademark. "Library Journal Academic Newswire" is a trademark.
- Prev by Date: A bad case of DVD rot eats into movie collections
- Next by Date: Re: Elsevier's Vanishing Act-The Real Issue
- Prev by thread: Re: Charleston Advisor vol. 4 no. 3
- Next by thread: A bad case of DVD rot eats into movie collections
- Index(es):