[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Vanishing Act -- continued
- To: "Liblicense-L (E-mail)" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Vanishing Act -- continued
- From: "T Scott Plutchak" <tscott@uab.edu>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:18:42 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
As the most recent posts on this issue have pointed out (Lapelerie, 1/23; Watkinson 1/24; Goodman 1/25), there is a significant gap between the policy that is supposedly in place at Elsevier (Menefee 11/6/02 on the redelscustomers list), and the actual practice that is taking place. Bad enough to have a policy that is troubling in principle, opaque in practice, and relies on the academic community to trust that it will be faithfully executed -- even worse to see how far short the practice actually falls from the policy. David Goodman points out the only acceptable circumstance for removing an article -- the order from a court of competent jurisdiction (and, as I have argued here previously, internationally accepted standards in this area should reduce even those circumstances to something approaching zero). The lawyerly fear of some possible legal action is absolutely insufficient for a major player in the academic arena. Even if Elsevier is unwilling to take such a step at this point, they should immediately revise their practice to properly annotate those cases in which articles have been removed so that the academic community can make some judgment about what is actually happening to the literature. Such a step would at least indicate some consideration of these issues and a willingness to participate in the dialog. (Elsevier's silence on the issue since the appearance of the Chronicle article has been disappointing to say the least -- if they have made some statement somewhere that I've missed, I'd appreciate anyone directing me to it.) Anthony Watkinson mentions a number of the organizations that ought to be taking up this issue. In addition to those he mentions, this has been a topic of discussion within the Medical Library Association Board of Directors and I have been in contact with the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors to see if it can be placed on the agenda for their upcoming June board meeting. I strongly encourage readers of this list who are officers and members of relevant organizations to take this issue to those organizations. T. Scott Plutchak Editor, Journal of the Medical Library Association Director, Lister Hill Library of the Health Sciences University of Alabama at Birmingham tscott@uab.edu
- Prev by Date: CNSLP secures national license for ScienceDirect
- Next by Date: Re: vanishing act
- Prev by thread: Chronicle article: 6 Institutions Will Help Fine-Tune a Popular NewArchiving Program
- Next by thread: RE: Vanishing Act -- continued
- Index(es):