[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- From: "Marc Brodsky" <brodsky@aip.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 22:26:30 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Music CDs come in more or less standard sizes and therefore pricing per unit is discernible, not so for journals without counting articles, pages or other unit measures. Some publishers do internal unit measures and one can seem that by noting similar thickness for most volumes. Others do not and publish as soon as material is processed and ready. Yes there are other factors as well, but one should not ignore quantity. Marc Brodsky >>> espositoj@att.net 01/17/03 07:30PM >>> If it were true that journals were indeed priced by the article, there might be something to this analysis, but journals are not priced that way, any more than music CDs are priced by the song. Nor are they priced as a strict function of cost. They are (mostly) priced as a function of several factors, including costs, risk, invested capital, and market opportunity. The biggest expense is in finding customers--call this marketing--which is very difficult in a world that is awash in published research. Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Re: The American Diabetes Association
- Next by Date: What happened to Neuropsychopharmacology?
- Prev by thread: Re: journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- Next by thread: review process
- Index(es):