[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- From: "Fytton Rowland" <J.F.Rowland@lboro.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 08:35:06 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I think perhaps Joe Esposito has misunderstood the point of David Goodman's figures. David was not discussing pricing journals by the article ("pay per view"). He was trying to work out whether universities would save or lose money in the event of a complete swing to the "author-pays" model. (If it is *me* who is misunderstanding David's intention no doubt he'll tell me so!) A generalised calculation for university X would go something like this. At present, the library pays $Y per annum in journal subscriptions and site licences to obtain print and/or electronic scholarly journals. If in future, the (electronic-only) journals are free of charge to users, then university X saves $Y. However, authors working in that university publish a total of Z papers per annum in the refereed scholarly literature, and the journals now charge authors' institutions $500 per published article. So the university pays $500Z per annum. The question then is - for various different universities, is $Y greater or smaller than $500Z? Of course, it is the *library* budget that saves the $Y; and what budget head pays the $500Z will probably vary between universities. This point bothers some people, and there will certainly be some nasty internal political infighting within universities. But that does not alter the net effect on the overall costs of the whole university. Fytton Rowland, Loughborough University, UK. ----- Original Message ----- From: <espositoj@att.net> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 12:30 AM Subject: Re: journal and publication costs, corrected figures > If it were true that journals were indeed priced by the article, there > might be something to this analysis, but journals are not priced that way, > any more than music CDs are priced by the song. Nor are they priced as a > strict function of cost. They are (mostly) priced as a function of > several factors, including costs, risk, invested capital, and market > opportunity. The biggest expense is in finding customers--call this > marketing--which is very difficult in a world that is awash in published > research. > > Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Re: What if open access publishers close down
- Next by Date: RE: journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- Prev by thread: RE: journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- Next by thread: RE: journal and publication costs, corrected figures
- Index(es):