[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What if open access publishers close down
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: What if open access publishers close down
- From: "James A. Robinson" <jim.robinson@stanford.edu>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 23:06:15 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I think David and I are thinking along similar lines. I think my question was probably not clear. I was thinking that, even though something is open and available, it does not necessarily follow that someone is going to be retrieving, organizing, and storing it. I was wondering if people had efforts underway to make sure that something which may be archived actually does get archived. I'm somewhat familier with the LOCKSS project, since it has associations with my own department. However, my understanding of LOCKSS is that it's meant as a fail-safe, one operating on a grand scale of peer-to-peer networking to ensure validity, but still thought it was meant as a fail-safe which keeps a static copy of content. Perhaps I'm mistaken in that understanding. If an operation along the lines of BMC were to shut down, would another group be ready to host and maintain all of the content, the nicely indexed pages, search features, and so forth? In other words, take up the former role of a defunct open access provider? Jim
- Prev by Date: review process
- Next by Date: Re: journal pricing
- Prev by thread: Re: What if open access publishers close down
- Next by thread: RE: What if open access publishers close down
- Index(es):