[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: charge for CD-ROM site licensing
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: charge for CD-ROM site licensing
- From: Harvey Brenneise <HBrenne@MPHI.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 12:40:42 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Yes, I think CD-ROM is bad also, and would like to find solutions that can be networked from a server. I know that HighWire Press has helped some publishers get at least some of their backfiles online. I don't know which publishers see their backfiles as a potential revenue source to "milk" (like the American Medical Association) and which would just like to get the project done. I suspect that some of the latter need our help as librarians in doing this. This week I did a project to review what journals we had available online, and was pleasantly surprised to find that it was about 90%. I contacted some of the other editors and asked them what plans they had for digitizing. Some were in process, and some were clueless. I believe some of the latter could use our help, and if they are willing to not want to make it a revenue source, I believe with either library money or grant money, some of these backfiles could be brought online quite easily. I've seen prices as low as 4 cents a page to create a .pdf file from a "chopped" print resource. CD-ROM is old technology and I simply don't want to "go there." Harvey Brenneise Michigan Public Health Institute hbrenne@mphi.org -----Original Message----- From: Peter Picerno [mailto:ppicerno@nova.edu] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 8:53 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: charge for CD-ROM site licensing I would have to agree that back issues on a CD-ROM are a pretty useless commodity: they represent cataloging/storage/retrieval/use problems and in my experience few users will take the time and bother to fiddle with a CD, and if articles are available through other means such as ILL or document delivery they will remain the procurement methods of choice for those seeking a specific article. The publishers would be wiser to establish a digital archive available on the WWW (which would then justify a site license), or maybe they should throw their hat into the JSTOR/Project Muse ring. I would be hard pressed to be able to justify a site license for a CD-ROM product (which most of us tend to think of as one-time capital purchases, anyway). But, of course, these are only my opinions, and I'll be interested to see what other takes on the subject are. Peter Picerno
- Prev by Date: Re: Elsevier's Vanishing Act
- Next by Date: Chronicle article: Subscription Service's Difficulties Could Be Costly for Libraries and Publishers
- Prev by thread: RE: charge for CD-ROM site licensing
- Next by thread: Licensing Review & Negotiation -- ARL/OLMS Online Lyceum course
- Index(es):