[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Faxon / Divine



Of course, it's worth pointing out that at this point there's been no
official word on any of these reports, so I can't vouch for their veracity
(or lack thereof.) Please take my mentioning of them with a major grain of
salt.

Richard Jasper
Houston
richardj@library.tmc.edu

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 5:58 PM
To: Liblicense-L
Subject: Faxon / Divine

It could be that I'm getting my listservs confused but I don't think I've
seen anything (yet) on Liblicense-L about Faxon / Divine, which appears to
be on the ropes (again.) There's been a major flurry of discussion on the
Medlib listserv, with multiple medical libraries being informed by
publishers that payments for their subs haven't been received.

Not a Liblicense issue, per se, but certainly related.
Just a heads up from a non-Faxon library.

Richard P. Jasper, M.Ln.
Assistant Director for Collections
HAM-TMC Library