[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Message from Kevin Guthrie, JSTOR's President
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Message from Kevin Guthrie, JSTOR's President
- From: Tom Williams <twilliam@bbl.usouthal.edu>
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:00:36 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Bernie, when we purchase new licenses for e journals, we generally start out with a very small number(1 to 3). It usually takes a few months for our users to catch on anyway, no matter how much PR we do. Then we monitor it closely and as we begin to get too many busy signals we call them and add more users - very easy and fast to do. They'll generally add on the extra licenses that same day and bill you. -- Thomas L. Williams, AHIP Director, Biomedical Libraries and Media Production Services University of South Alabama College of Medicine Mobile, Al 36688-0002 tel. (251)460-6885 fax. (251)460-7638 twilliam@bbl.usouthal.edu On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Sloan, Bernie wrote: > I'm wondering if anyone has developed a reliable method for predicting the > number of simultaneous users one might need to license for a given > database. (I realize that there are all sorts of variables that factor > into this). > > Ten years ago I was trying to calculate the number of simultaneous users > needed for 39 libraries to access a database. I made an educated guess > (which was way too high) and gradually worked my way down to the right > number (which took several license years). I was just wondering if anyone > has improved on the "educated guess" method to calculate the initial > number of simultaneous users. > > Bernie Sloan
- Prev by Date: RE: Pricing models, was RE: Message from Kevin Guthrie, JSTOR'sPresident
- Next by Date: security issues (was JSTOR)
- Prev by thread: RE: Message from Kevin Guthrie, JSTOR's President
- Next by thread: Re: Message from Kevin Guthrie, JSTOR's President
- Index(es):