[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Message from Kevin Guthrie, JSTOR's President (LONG)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Message from Kevin Guthrie, JSTOR's President (LONG)
- From: "Anthony Watkinson" <anthony.watkinson@btopenworld.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 14:40:10 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
To my mind this is an extremely sensible posting. All licenses are essentially based on trust. Publishers could put technological measures in place but they are expensive and do we want them in the area of scholarly communication? This is not a rhetorical question. There are concerns about authenticity but as yet they are not big concerns. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Davis" <pmd8@cornell.edu> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 2:24 PM Subject: RE: Message from Kevin Guthrie, JSTOR's President (LONG) > Any form of authentication based on a virtual identity has some risk of > fraud. Like Rick Anderson states, we need to take "reasonable measures". > Our first generation Library Gateway was based on user-names and > passwords. And while we took "reasonable measures" to keep these accounts > within the Cornell Community, we were sure that many of them left the > country. As long as the publisher is willing to work with their clients > to reduce the risk of abuse, there doesn't appear to be a good-enough > argument to revamp our authentication methods, or turn the library into a > police state. > > --Philip Davis > pmd8@cornell.edu
- Prev by Date: Strange subscription policy -- journal of forensic sciences
- Next by Date: Norwegian Teen Pleads Innocent in DVD Copy Protection Trial
- Prev by thread: RE: Message from Kevin Guthrie, JSTOR's President (LONG)
- Next by thread: Re: Shrinkwrap contract on books (fwd)
- Index(es):