[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NGO immunity from prosecution
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: NGO immunity from prosecution
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 19:06:29 EST
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I suspect that it would be relatively difficult to sucessfully sue or force arbitration on any international organization, no matter what was in a contract. (And analogously for any other governmental publication, though there's always the Court of Claims or the state equivalent.) On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Kimberly Parker wrote: > I'm reviewing an IMF license and found a new wrinkle in immunity that I > thought I'd share with this community. > > In this license (which is otherwise based on the Cox model license) the > International Monetary Fund is claiming immunity from any judicial > process. I will quote the entire section below. > > I had to send this question up our review chain ladder as I'd never > encountered this type of declaration before. I can't imagine us ever > suing IMF for breach of license, but it was still unusual. The > arbitration offerings are probably enough to keep us feeling sensible > about this, but I thought I'd offer the statement here for discussion. > > --Kimberly Parker
- Prev by Date: FW: Morgan Stanley on the STM Publishing market
- Next by Date: Re: NGO immunity from prosecution
- Prev by thread: NGO immunity from prosecution
- Next by thread: Re: NGO immunity from prosecution
- Index(es):