[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: jurisdiction language
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: jurisdiction language
- From: "James J. O'Donnell" <jod@georgetown.edu>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:16:33 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
so what does an acceptable Europe-only license look like? > I don't believe that the Commonwealth of Virginia would agree to that > phrase. We have a standard clause saying we will not agree to be bound by > any arbitration or the decision of any arbitration board, commissions, > panel or other entity. We also say very clearly that we will not agree to > any law of any state other than Virginia. > > (sounds unfriendly, but there it is). > > Interestingly, we've never had a problem with either of those clauses, > especially once we make it clear that we would have to take any exceptions > to the Commonwealth Attorney General and we could expect serious delays if > we did that. > > Kathy > > Katherine A. Perry > VIVA Director > 703/993-4652 > 703/993-4662 (fax) > kperry@gmu.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: jurisdiction language
- Next by Date: Re: jurisdiction question
- Prev by thread: Re: jurisdiction language
- Next by thread: Re: jurisdiction language
- Index(es):