[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: jurisdiction language
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: jurisdiction language
- From: "Richard Jasper" <richardj@library.tmc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 18:52:12 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I'm fairly sure that the institution I previously served would NOT agree to this language, since they were unwilling to bind themselves to arbitration. If "state of Georgia" was not acceptable, the preference was that the contract remain silent on the issue of governing law. Best regards... Richard P. Jasper, M.Ln. Houston, Texas -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:49 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: jurisdiction language Would the following language be acceptable to US state universities in lieu of a statement about governing law? In other words, there would be no statement about jurisdiction except this. Jim O'Donnell Georgetown University "In the event any dispute or controversy arising out of or relating to this Agreement, the parties agree to exercise their best efforts to resolve the dispute as soon as possible. In the event that the parties can not by exercise of their best efforts resolve the dispute, they shall submit the dispute to a mutually acceptable arbitrator they have chosen."
- Prev by Date: RE: jurisdiction language
- Next by Date: Re: jurisdiction language
- Prev by thread: RE: jurisdiction language
- Next by thread: Re: jurisdiction language
- Index(es):