[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OECD "terms"
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: OECD "terms"
- From: "Fytton Rowland" <J.F.Rowland@lboro.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:05:44 EDT
- Reply-To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Having heard some interesting and innovative ideas from Toby Green of OECD, I am sure Anthony is right, and that there was no malevolent intent. Fytton Rowland. ----- Original Message ----- From: <anthony.watkinson@btinternet.com> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>; <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 3:55 PM Subject: RE: OECD "terms" > As someone who put some of the first print journals online and began to > grapple with the implications, I do want to assure readers of this list > that attempting to avoid a license but stating terms and conditions did > not seem to me then 'bizarre' or 'ludicrous'. The idea as to minimise all > the work involved in framing licenses and getting them signed. It was Ann > Okerson who put me right and I was grateful. > > OECD are book publishers and the all the complications involved in > licensing that we serials types are familiar with are for them to > discover. I am certain (knowing them) that attempts to cause subscribers > problems is very far from their intentions and that they will appreciate > guidance rather than scorn.
- Prev by Date: Re: E-resource licensing and virtual reference
- Next by Date: Re: E-resource licensing and virtual reference
- Prev by thread: Re: Question re: Lessig and the Creative Commons project
- Next by thread: Re: E-resource licensing and virtual reference
- Index(es):